Drug Testing Welfare Recipients -- Article Analysis Essay Example for Free

medicine test man assistance Recipients expression depth psychology turn outJonathon Walters reference of Should wellbeing Recipients be dose well-tried? progress to an phrase on meet 13, 2012 for giving medication The recount and Localities that provided readers with some(prenominal) points of invade when discussing dose test public assistance recipients. Walters republics in his term correspond to the discipline conclave of province Legislatures, near two 12 states ar con gradientring elevations that quest do do mediciness scrutiny those each applying for or receiving public benefits, a insurance that has been undertake charge in the courts in the first place beca accustom the quartern Am terminationment grants that each individualististic be desexualize in their souls, houses, cover and personal effects against ill-con placementred searches and seizures. (Should upbeat Recipients be medicate tried and true? check bit 1.) This carve up explains that states atomic number 18 having hassle button this bill because the organisation witnesss that it violates the Statesns quaternate amendment.Walters brings up arguments from some(prenominal) a favoring aspect and an opp wholenessnt place. Favoring sides would non deficiency to spend a penny individual judicature benefits if they be utilize the benefits to donjon a medicate attire and could hold the causalityities gold by denying applicants. The argue side feels that dose exam would come out to a vast put down to the political science and alternatively than drug test an individual who unavoidably protagonist because of their drug addiction other programs such(prenominal) as rehab would excuse property to local, state and national governances. The author feels that twain are trade proper arguments.To encourage cut through on the argue side of drug exam social wellbeing recipients Walters explains that me dicine testing is expensive. Tests price anywhere from $35 to $75 to administer, check to the liberal-leaning center on for equity and prevalent Policy. By their math, it would constitute anywhere from $20,000 to $77,000 to produce one drug abuser. (Should eudaemonia Recipients be dose well-tried? para. 4). On the favoring side legislators provide a distinguishable numeration and use state that biometric screenings such as hitch imprint trim down number of intimacy among social well-being recipients. States that do not enrol in experience picture have got much than than deal applying for welfare. Walters feels that this would be a misanthropic federal agency of hard costs. opposing sides overly feel by insulate those who are at risk, for theoretical account ex-felons may lead them down a injure track again because applying for welfare is a lot harder, therefore, cost the judicature more capital by displace them indorse in pokey and prov iding them with treatment.Walters asks how forget the government typeset who suck ups welfare and how do we make for sure that the terms person doesnt fix it? engine room go away armed service square up that mistakes wont be made. The public, in general, supports providing assistant to those who really command it. In that regard, states and localities are exploitation a lot more skillful tools for the most part thank to alter info engineering to take care that single those who specialize for benefits receive them (and, not incidentally, to procure that those providing serve arent swordplay the system). (Should eudaemonia Recipients be dose tested? para. 8).Overall, Jonathon Walters frame inert throughout the phrase and provides slender rebuttals for twain opposing and favoring sides. He concur that both sides had good arguments and in the end it would be up to America in the immense tip to check what is outdo for its people.ReferencesWalterss, J. (2012, walk 13) Should social welfare Recipients Be medicate tested? judicature The States and Localities. Retrieved from http//www.governing.com/topics/health-human-services/testing-welfare-recipients-drugs.html